Thursday, 10 June 2021
Alliance MLA for North Down Andrew Muir has spoken out in favour of a ban on Conversion Therapy in a Northern Ireland Assembly debate on Tuesday 20 April 2021.
Mr Muir served as the first openly gay Mayor in Northern Ireland in 2013/14, and is one of only two openly gay MLAs at Stormont. In the debate on Tuesday, Mr Muir spoke passionately about the deeply damaging impact that conversion therapy has had with some of his own LGBT friends taking their lives due to the deep rooted and endemic homophobia in society.
Speaking after the debate, Mr Muir said “So called “Conversion Therapy” is an extremely harmful practice that can cause lasting psychological damage to those who go through it. Today, the Assembly sent out a clear message: being LGBT is not something that can be “cured”. There is nothing wrong with being LGBT, and we should celebrate people for who we are rather than trying to change them”.
“Following today’s debate, the Minister for Communities needs to act and bring forward legislation that effectively outlaws conversion therapy in Northern Ireland. It has been over a year since the Assembly was restored. With a year or less until the next Assembly election, the Minister urgently needs to bring forward this overdue legislation”.
Note to editors – Hansard of debate below, photo of Andrew Muir MLA speaking in debate attached.
Mr Muir: To start, I thank Doug and John for tabling today's motion. I know them as allies of the LGBT community, alongside others in the Chamber such as Carál Ní Chuilín, whom I have known for many years and who supported me when I was much younger and less grey-haired as an LGBT activist. I really appreciate them tabling today's motion, and I appreciate the work that so many have done, including my colleague Paula Bradshaw. I also thank, in particular, those who have been involved in a very successful, professional and well-organised campaign. I am impressed by the work that has been done. I speak as an Alliance Party MLA on behalf of the party. I am conscious of the need for a respectful debate, because people are watching, and the way that the debate plays out has impacts.
On Saturday, I was sorting out the books in my study, having got new shelves from a well-known furniture retailer. I found one of my books — 'Boy Erased' — which was given to me as a gift by one of my best friends, who was able to come to terms with his sexuality and with his friends and family in relation to that. I strongly recommend the book in relation to today's debate. Alongside the book, I found a postcard that was given to me in the late 1990s when I was at university in Derry. Things have moved on somewhat from then. At the top, it says, "Lesbians and gay men are". Well, we have moved on to be more inclusive than that, as the LGBT community. The postcard says that they are our daughters, sons, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, cousins, grandparents, uncles, aunts, in-laws, carers, cared-for, friends, work colleagues, customers and service users. That is whom we are talking about today. The issue that we are debating has a significant impact on so many people: not just my LGBT brothers and sisters but their wider families, friends and work colleagues.
I am very fortunate to have had a very inclusive upbringing, a very supportive family and a mother who is probably more liberal than I am, but I am conscious of those who have not and of the impact of this debate on them, particularly the DUP amendment tabled on Friday. That amendment has caused hurt and offence, and people have contacted me saying that they have been re-traumatised by it, particularly the desire to remove the wording about a "fix or cure". I really regret that that has happened.
Ms Armstrong: I thank the Member for giving way. Does the Member agree that it has been heartbreaking to hear, over the last week or so, from people who have been so traumatised by the amendment? It has traumatised a vast part of the community, which did not expect this to happen.
Mr Speaker: The Member has an extra minute.
Mr Muir: Thank you, Mr Speaker. I agree with Ms Armstrong. All the amendment does is harm. The DUP needs to recognise that it is on the wrong side of history on this. The debate that we have had in recent days about the amendment has shown that society has moved on quite a lot. The idea that a ban on conversion therapy can be an attack on religious freedom is building a straw man. Any legislation that is passed by this place would have to be compliant with the European Convention on Human Rights, especially article 9. I am used to these straw men being built, especially in relation to equal marriage. We were told that the sky would fall in if we legislated for equal marriage. The reality is that people are a bit more equal and are happier in love. The sky has not fallen in.
For me, when we are debating conversion therapy, it touches the core of what is deep-rooted homophobia in our society. There is an idea that sexuality is a choice and a lifestyle. I chose to wear a bow tie today. That is a lifestyle choice; my sexuality is not. It also goes to the core of deep-rooted transphobia in our society. The reality is that it is perfectly good and normal for one man to love another man, for one woman to love another woman or for someone to fulfil their gender identity. The failure to recognise and accept that shows why we need an effective ban. We need that ban. This must not be symbolic legislation. That would be an insult and would allow the harm to continue.
A definition of conversion therapy is essential to allow that effective ban, and the Ban Conversion Therapy coalition of LGBT+ organisations has provided a recommended legal definition, which is about actions to encourage someone to erase, repress or change their sexuality or gender identity. Asking someone to repress, for example, their sexual orientation is deeply harmful. I know people to whom it has happened. I know people who suffered from the homophobia and transphobia in our society to such an extent that they took their life. We have a responsibility in this place to ensure that an effective ban is brought forward. Yes, it must be done through co-production and co-design with the LGBT community, but this Assembly mandate must end with an effective ban.
North Down Alliance MLA Andrew Muir has spoken in the Assembly in support of the Climate Change Bill presented by all parties other than the DUP.
|Photo of Andrew Muir MLA during debate on 10 May 2021|
Commenting on the issue, Andrew Muir MLA stated “This bill is long overdue. Northern Ireland is the only part of the UK that does not have its own Xlimate Change Act. This has consequences. In the decade from 2008, when Westminster passed the Climate Chance Act, emissions in the rest of the UK have fallen by more than 20%. In Northern Ireland they have fallen by less than 10%.
I am therefore glad to see the Bill presented and able now to pass to further stages for scrutinity, refinement and finalisation. Whilst I welcome the fact it was passed to progress to the next stage by a margin of 58 to 29 it’s disappointing the Ulster Unionist Party are now split and no longer fully backing the bill with two MLAs voting to stop the Bill.”
Speaking on issues related to the Bill, Andrew Muir MLA stated the following in the Assembly Chamber “In the past decade, we have improved our public transport network immeasurably and delivered better-quality services and customer experiences, but there is still not enough progress in generating a modal shift from cars to Active Travel and Public Transport. Last year, the Minister for Infrastructure, with the best of intentions, no doubt, pledged to seize the opportunity for a green recovery from COVID-19, yet, more than a year later, we find ourselves deeply frustrated at the pace of change.
Active Travel made up 2.5% of the Department for Infrastructure's Capital Budget for last year. For every one person who works in DFI's Transport policy division, which includes Active Travel, more than 40 work in DFI Roads. The actions required include the rapid roll-out of electric vehicle charging infrastructure, the current set-up is a shambles, and the Department for Infrastructure's budget needs to be rebalanced to fund Active Travel properly and to review Concessionary Fares in order to get more young people using our rapidly decarbonised public transport network. Last month, the Alliance Party published its Green New Deal. It sets out many other measures that we need to take to meet the requirements in the Bill.”
Alliance North Down MLA Andrew Muir has raised the issue of Utility Companies failing to reinstate roads and footpaths to an adequate standard during a meeting of the Infrastructure Committee at Stormont last week (Wednesday 26 may 2021) with current situation described as a ‘dog’s dinner’.
|Works on Chippendale Vale, Bangor|
Commenting on the issue Mr Muir said “I continue to receive a huge amount of complaints from residents all over North Down reporting that roads and footpaths outside their homes have been left as a botched patchwork of tarmac following works by utilities companies. I appreciate that this work is vital in providing basic services to many homes but the standard of re-instatements is often woeful.
Correspondence I recently received from the Department outlined that Utility companies have a legal right to place and maintain their services in the footway and carriageway but have to adhere to a certain standard of re-instatement when doing so. When footpaths already have a number of cracked and broken flags the use of bitumen is permitted but this should only be allowed if the area is imminently due for resurfacing works by the Department.
In some cases works are done to newly resurfaced roads or footpaths which seems completely madness. Better communication and co-ordination between the Utilities companies and the Department for Infrastructure is essential alongside much higher standard of work. It’s clear there needs to be a tightening of the procedures and standards for the work completed as well as a higher level of follow up inspections and enforcement around this from the Department. The current situation is best described as dog’s dinner! The Committee unanimously agreed to write to the Infrastructure Minister around this and I will be following up on her response once received.”
A request for yellow line re-instatement has been made to the Department for Infrastructure following recent remedial works to the road surface and footpaths at the entrance to the Crawfordsburn Brow Development on Crawfordsburn Main Street.
North Down Alliance MLA Andrew Muir said “After chasing the Developer for over a year to request works be completed to the road and footways at the entrance to Crawfordsburn Brow Development I was glad to see new surfaces had been put down at the beginning of April this year. Full re-surfacing of Main Street is however now required to properly seam the development into Main Street.
We will have to wait and see if these latest works stand the test of time but in the interim I have requested the re-instatement of double yellow lines along this stretch of the road at the top of the Main Street. It is a busy through road and had previously had double yellow lines on both sides of the road.
Now there are pavements and curbs at the entrance to the Development cars have been parking along this stretch and causing obstructions. It’s vital the lines are re-instated to prevent problem parking here or even an accident from occurring with vehicles coming round the bend at speed. I will be following up my request with the Department to ensure action is taken promptly.”